Marque | Intel |
---|---|
Disponibilité des pièces détachées | Information indisponible sur les pièces détachées |
Image indisponible
couleur :
-
-
-
- Pour voir cette vidéo, téléchargez Flash Player
Intel Core i9-13900KF Processeur de bureau 24 cœurs (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36 Mo de cache, jusqu'à 5,8 GHz
Marque | Intel |
Fabricant de CPU | Intel |
Socket du CPU | LGA 1700 |
Plateforme | Mac OS X El Capitan 10.11, Windows 11, Windows 10 |
Cache secondaire | 32 MB |
Puissance | 253 Watts |
Taille du cache | 36 Modificateur inconnu |
Nombre de processeurs | 1 |
À propos de cet article
- 24 noyaux (8 noyaux P + 16 noyaux) et 32 fils
- L'architecture hybride de performance intègre deux microarchitectures centrales, priorisation et distribution des charges de travail pour optimiser les performances
- Jusqu'à 5,8 GHz déverrouillé. Cache 36 m
- Compatible avec les cartes mères Intel 600 Series et 700 Series
- Technologie Turbo Boost Max 3.0 et prise en charge PCIe 5.0 et 4.0. Prise en charge de la mémoire Intel Optane. Aucune solution thermique incluse. Graphiques discrets requis
Les clients ayant consulté cet article ont également regardé
Informations sur le produit
Descriptif technique
Informations complémentaires
Moyenne des commentaires client |
4.6 étoile(s) sur 5 |
---|---|
Numéro du modèle de l'article | BX8071513900KF |
ASIN | B0BCFM3CJ4 |
Date de mise en ligne sur Amazon.com.be | 28 septembre 2022 |
Garantie et Assistance
Votre avis
Description du produit
Processeur de bureau Intel Core i9-13900KF 24 cœurs (8 cœurs P + 16 cœurs E-cores) 36 M de cache jusqu'à 5,8 GHz
Description du fabricant





Commentaires client
Les avis clients, y compris le nombre d'étoiles des produits, permettent aux acheteurs potentiels d'en savoir plus sur un produit et de déterminer s'il répond à leurs besoins.
Pour calculer le nombre d'étoiles et leur répartition en pourcentage, nous n'utilisons pas une moyenne simple. En effet, notre système prend en compte certains critères comme l'ancienneté d'un avis ou encore si l'auteur de cet avis a acheté l'article sur Amazon. De plus, il analyse les avis pour en vérifier la fiabilité.
En savoir plus sur le fonctionnement des avis clients sur AmazonMeilleurs commentaires provenant d’autres pays

my use case is productivity. i’m a developer, and this is the sole reason i upgraded. I was fighting windows freezing and slowing down during a lot of my workflows. I use wsl intellj, docker, react apps java etc, often at the same time. It’s pretty noticeable the improvement. It really helped. Like that i could use ddr4 for now since the boards are about 150 it was acceptable.
Heat: The cpu gets a bad reputation due to heat and wattage. I put this in the bucket frankly that amd got as well. I mean it’s fine they are using as much power as needed to maximize perf. I limited the cpu to 250w, and it runs on a d15 cooler than my 5900, Full load can get up to high 80c, but working is 30’s. you lose very little perf by running it more in the zone. I don't know about other boards but that msi one sure makes it easy and the price if right.
About the cpu: it has a ton of cores, I didn't need to buy ddr5-- i need quite a lot of ram and it still costs too much for the benefit it provides in my workload. The memory controller on 13gen is far better than ryzen 5000 series. I couldn't before get my ddr4 stable at 4000 on the 5900x and it did it on the intel one immediately. Indeed i was even able to tighten up the timings just a touch. So modern processors (and i'd assume the amd ones as well) have made welcome improvements to memory support. Id' say if you don't need as much ram say 32gb, and you don't have ddr4 already to tide you over i'd consider getting ddr5 though. I mean nothing is cheaper than what you have and 4k speed is fine. If i had nothing or maybe some old ram i'd go w/ ddr5.
Price: For 570 it’s decent deal here. It is more than i love spending, but for what you get it is a lot better than what amd is offering at the time i write this which was 700.
I do wish intel supported board reuse down the line, but that even can. be overblown (to an extent, and only an extent) though it's a selling feature to me frankly reuse!! I had to really think about that. I don't understand why intel is so stubborn on this subject. with my amd cpu i went from 2700x to 5900x and the board went from a 470 to 570 because i waned more io and better pcie but i also gave that board to my kid and upgraded it one time. With intel especially I mean i just buy cheap boards anyway and upgrade more because there are a ton of features that get added half the time. I usually try to spend about 150 on a board, though it. is getting harder but it would be more my preference. I 'm not really onboard with the 600 motherboards. Is there a 300 one in-between i guess so but that's equally unappealing to me esp w/ out the upgrade.
Tips/A rant if you will: trust me on this that msi board for 159 is so amazing. It really works great. don’t worry about the vrm. that’s also very overblown too. you can go calculate the amperage this will not come close. ALso msi is a great brand and the bios is easy to navigate. If you want fancy audio buy a dac that you can reuse and plug into usb and keep reusing it. Just think about what you really need in there. The msi board has a nice selection of pcie slots and well placed nvme. I use multiple gpu one nvidia gpu quatro for encoding (its a small one) and and amd one 6900 i bought for 570 for gaming. I just really love the layout connectivity and features of the board. They cut all the stuff i don't need and pared with the cpu it's all together about 700 for a cpu and board, pretty much as good as you can get.


UPS says the computer is using 575 watts during the CPU stress test, about 175 watts at idle. TPU is 253w ... so with the 80%+ PS inefficiency, 300w makes sense.
When using the 3080 GPU with the i9 CPU ... well, the heat coming from the case is similar to a 1000w space heater, really. Now reconsidering my choice for only an 850w PS. 1000w would probably be a better idea for this beast.
As for speed. That's relative. But I am coming from an i9-7900x, and this is 3x faster, and it feels 3x faster. Memory is slower, (4ch vs 2ch) -- so I had to use DDR5-6400 to get a similar memory bandwidth. Lost some latency, but the overall effect is the thing still seems plenty fast.
I dislike the way the CPU case instantly jumps to 100c -- no thermal mass what-so-ever in the CPU case. Or I have a bad CPU without whatever filler Intel puts between the die and the case.
In any case, Intel needs to allow for more thermal mass to reduce these thermal stresses of instantaneous temp changes. Has to be stressing the silicon and lead to more thermal stress failures.




Commenté au Canada 🇨🇦 le 5 janvier 2023
